Do you have any idea about Critical Reasoning? Practically you are not good with the Critical Reasoning Quiz. Therefore it is a right opportunity for the aspirants can give a quick look at this page. Hence, the candidates who are willing to write the Competitive Exams. This Critical Reasoning Quiz Questions will be more helpful to you in those exams. This Quiz will act like a Mock Test for the final exams. In addition to that, we have already provided the Critical Reasoning Quiz Questions and Answers. And also for to get good results in the various level of exams we have given you the Critical Reasoning Quiz Questions and Answers pdf. In this, we have mentioned the details, about the topic, benefits of by practicing this critical Reasoning, final results of the Quiz as shown below.
Critical Reasoning Quiz Details
In the view of this concept, we give 20 questions in the Quiz which takes 30 minutes of time to complete the Critical Reasoning Quiz. The aspirants can take this Quiz gain good marks which helps you in your future different level of exams.
| Join Telegram |  |
| Join Whatsapp Groups |  |
| Quiz Name | Critical Reasoning |
| Category | Reasoning |
| Number of Questions | 20 |
| Time | 30 Minutes |
| Exam Type | MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions) |
Critical Reasoning Quiz Online Test – Practice Now
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
1. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the given data?
A. All dogs are friendly.
B. Some dogs are friendly.
C. No dogs are friendly.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. Some dogs are friendly.
Explanation: The given data does not state that all dogs are friendly, nor does it state that no dogs are friendly. However, it does mention that “my neighbor’s dog is friendly”, which implies that at least some dogs are friendly.
2. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All politicians are corrupt.
Premise 2: John is a politician.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. John is corrupt.
B. John is not corrupt.
C. Some politicians are corrupt.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. John is corrupt.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise states that all politicians are corrupt. Its second premise establishes that John is a politician. Therefore, it logically follows that John is corrupt as well.
3. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All birds have wings.
Premise 2: Penguins are birds.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. Penguins can fly.
B. Penguins cannot fly.
C. Penguins have no wings.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. Penguins cannot fly.
Explanation: The first premise states that all birds have wings. The second premise establishes that penguins are birds. However, penguins are flightless birds, which means they cannot fly even though they have wings.
4. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: People who wear glasses are smart.
Premise 2: John wears glasses.
Conclusion: John is smart.
A. All people who wear glasses are smart.
B. Only people who wear glasses are smart.
C. John is the only person who wears glasses.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All people who wear glasses are smart.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that people who wear glasses are smart. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is smart to be logically valid.
5. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All cats are mammals.
Premise 2: All mammals have fur.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All cats have fur.
B. Some cats have fur.
C. No cats have fur.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All cats have fur.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all cats are mammals. The second premise states that all mammals have fur. Therefore, it logically follows that all cats have fur as well.
6. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: All doctors are wealthy.
Premise 2: John is a doctor.
Conclusion: John is wealthy.
A. All doctors are wealthy.
B. Some doctors are wealthy.
C. John is the only doctor.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All doctors are wealthy.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that all doctors are wealthy. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is wealthy to be logically valid.
7. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All apples are fruits.
Premise 2: Some fruits are red.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All apples are red.
B. Some apples are red.
C. No apples are red.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. Some apples are red.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all apples are fruits. The second premise states that some fruits are red, which implies that some apples are red.
8. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All elephants are herbivores.
Premise 2: Elephants are not carnivores.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. Elephants are omnivores.
B. Elephants are herbivores.
C. Elephants are carnivores.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. Elephants are herbivores.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all elephants are herbivores. The second premise negates the possibility that elephants are carnivores. Therefore, it logically follows that elephants are herbivores.
9. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All vegetables are healthy.
Premise 2: French fries are not healthy.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. French fries are not vegetables.
B. French fries are vegetables.
C. All vegetables are French fries.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. French fries are not vegetables.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all vegetables are healthy. The second premise negates the possibility that French fries are healthy. Therefore, it logically follows that French fries are not vegetables.
10. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: All college students are intelligent.
Premise 2: John is a college student.
Conclusion: John is intelligent.
A. All college students are intelligent.
B. Some college students are intelligent.
C. John is the only college student.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All college students are intelligent.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that all college students are intelligent. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is intelligent to be logically valid.
11. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All roses are flowers.
Premise 2: Some flowers are yellow.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All roses are yellow.
B. Some roses are yellow.
C. No roses are yellow.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. Some roses are yellow.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all roses are flowers. The second premise states that some flowers are yellow, which implies that some roses may also be yellow.
12. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All insects have six legs.
Premise 2: Spiders are not insects.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. Spiders have six legs.
B. Spiders have more than six legs.
C. Spiders have less than six legs.
D. None of the above.
Answer: D. None of the above.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all insects have six legs. The second premise states that spiders are not insects, which means that the information in the first premise does not apply to spiders. Therefore, no valid conclusion can be made about the number of legs spiders have.
13. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: All actors are famous.
Premise 2: John is an actor.
Conclusion: John is famous.
A. All actors are famous.
B. Some actors are famous.
C. John is the only actor.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All actors are famous.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that all actors are famous. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is famous to be logically valid.
14. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All cats are animals.
Premise 2: All dogs are animals.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All animals are cats or dogs.
B. All cats are dogs.
C. All dogs are cats.
D. None of the above.
Answer: D. None of the above.
Explanation: The premises establish that all cats and all dogs are animals. However, this does not allow for a valid conclusion about the relationship between cats and dogs or between animals and cats/dogs.
15. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: All doctors have medical degrees.
Premise 2: John does not have a medical degree.
Conclusion: John is not a doctor.
A. All doctors have medical degrees.
B. Some doctors do not have medical degrees.
C. John is the only person without a medical degree.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All doctors have medical degrees.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that all doctors have medical degrees. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is not a doctor to be logically valid.
16. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All cars have four wheels.
Premise 2: Bicycles do not have four wheels.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. Bicycles have no wheels.
B. Bicycles have four wheels.
C. Bicycles have more than four wheels.
D. None of the above.
Answer: D. None of the above.
Explanation: The premises establish that all cars have four wheels and that bicycles do not have four wheels. However, this does not allow for a valid conclusion about the number of wheels bicycles have.
17. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All mammals are warm-blooded.
Premise 2: All whales are mammals.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All whales are not warm-blooded.
B. All whales are warm-blooded.
C. Some whales are not warm-blooded.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. All whales are warm-blooded.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all mammals are warm-blooded. The second premise states that all whales are mammals, which implies that all whales are warm-blooded.
18. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All birds lay eggs.
Premise 2: John is a bird.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. John lays eggs.
B. John does not lay eggs.
C. Some birds do not lay eggs.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. John does not lay eggs.
Explanation: The premises establish that all birds lay eggs, but the conclusion cannot be drawn that John, who is assumed to be a bird, must lay eggs.
19. Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the given argument?
Premise 1: All politicians are liars.
Premise 2: John is a politician.
Conclusion: John is a liar.
A. All politicians are liars.
B. Some politicians are not liars.
C. John is the only politician.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All politicians are liars.
Explanation: The argument’s first premise makes the assumption that all politicians are liars. This assumption is necessary for the conclusion that John is a liar to be logically valid.
20. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All fish live in water.
Premise 2: All sharks are fish.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All sharks live in water.
B. All sharks are not fish.
C. Some fish do not live in water.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All sharks live in water.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all fish live in water. The second premise states that all sharks are fish, which implies that all sharks also live in water.
21. Which of the following is a valid conclusion from the given argument?
Premise 1: All elephants are mammals.
Premise 2: All mammals have lungs.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. All elephants have lungs.
B. All elephants do not have lungs.
C. Some mammals do not have lungs.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A. All elephants have lungs.
Explanation: The premises establish that all elephants are mammals and that all mammals have lungs. Therefore, it can be inferred that all elephants have lungs.
22. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All spiders have eight legs.
Premise 2: John has eight legs.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. John is a spider.
B. John is not a spider.
C. Some spiders do not have eight legs.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B. John is not a spider.
Explanation: The first premise establishes that all spiders have eight legs. The second premise states that John has eight legs, but this does not imply that John is a spider. Therefore, the conclusion must be that John is not a spider.
23. Which of the following is a valid inference from the given information?
Premise 1: All lawyers are smart.
Premise 2: John is not a lawyer.
Conclusion: ___________.
A. John is smart.
B. John is not smart.
C. Some lawyers are not smart.
D. None of the above.
Answer: D. None of the above.
Explanation: The premises establish that all lawyers are smart, but the conclusion cannot be drawn about John’s intelligence based on the information provided.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
At this post, we have given you the concept of Critical Reasoning. Furtherly this article contains more valuable information and the Questions which are asked mostly in the Reasoning section. The candidates should submit their Quiz after the completion of Quiz within the time. In the below page we are providing some vital information on the Critical Reasoning topic. Eventually, candidates can take the Quiz daily it will be a success. They will improve skills, and get the confidence to solve significant problems too. If you have any doubts, visit our website Freshersnow.com.
About Critical Reasoning Quiz
Critical Reasoning means it mostly it depends on the arguments like how they are Constructing, how to evaluate and finally how to identify them. In other words, Critical Reasoning is a skill that’s what all human beings are born with and how they sharpened their minds by practicing this type of Quizzes. By discussing this Critical Reasoning Quiz will help you every aspect of the topic whether the human beings have to decide it. Remember that this Critical Reasoning is already embedded in you when you born. Hence in Critical Reasoning, we discuss the topics that are related mostly to the Reasoning. Meanwhile, we should give a Quick look at this topic Critical Reasoning in that they have some role they are: a Critical thinker, gender differences, what I am? Who am I? And what is the purpose of living? How the other people react when seeing me?
Benefits of Practicing this Critical Reasoning Quiz
- Ultimately, the aspirants can improve their Reasoning skills.
- In fact, the candidate can follow the tips what we have provided that tricks and tips will help you in the Problem facing.
- Afterward, the aspirants can give grades on their own.
- By practicing this Quiz daily candidate can accurate while answering the questions that will increase their ability.
Results of Critical Reasoning
- Above all mentioned about the Quiz after the correct submission of the Quiz by the candidate, the marks will be allowed.
- Keep on practicing this Quiz you will become charmed on this topic.
- Finally, if you have any doubt regarding the topic, you can refer the Critical Reasoning Quiz Questions and Answers pdf.
For to know instance updates follow us on the website Freshersnow.com
Practice More Reasoning Questions and Answers